However, after months passed, no sign of official support surfaced and most of us gave up hope and moved on. This resulted in a handful of users actually gaining access to Linux (Beta). At one point, a new flag emerged that would allow for “experimental kernels” on some devices but these trials were done on a limited basis. There were glimmers of hope here and there. Time ticked by and before we knew it, 10th Gen Comet Lake devices became the standard for Chrome OS and it began to feel as if Skylake Chromebooks would simply be left out in the cold.ĭon’t get me wrong. As newer Kaby Lake Chromebooks came along, Skylake device owners were feeling rather put out as developers weren’t clear as to whether or not the 8th Gen chips would even get support for Linux. This was a bad situation all around given the fact that these Chromebooks were the cream of the crop at that point in time.
Unfortunately for users of devices like the Samsung Chromebook and ASUS Chromebook C302, Linux has eluded the 8th Gen Skylake processors from Intel. We are three years into the Crostini project that brought Linux app support to Chrome OS. As if it matters, your Skylake Chromebook can finally use Linux apps.Leave Your Comment Send this to a friend Get popcorn and watch the legitimacy of Campinos going up in flames (before fireworks the US celebrates independence, unlike EBA). As we said recently, "The EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal Has Already Lost the Case in the Court of Public Opinion" (irrespective of what will happen this coming Friday). They tried telling the public that sending the judges to an unlawful location (as collective punishment) would somehow restore their autonomy while they censor submissions to them, spy on their E-mails, and stack the hearings with not-so-independent operatives of Campinos. īoards of Appeal of the European Patent OfficeĨinOne | Richard-Reitzner-Allee 8 | 85540 Haar | Germany If you have any questions, please contact us. We recommend that you connect a few minutes beforehand to ensure everything is working for you. Please use the link below to access the streaming page at the start of the oral proceedings.
#Stealth control for mixxx registration
We are pleased to confirm your registration for the live stream of the oral proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal in case G 1/21 on Friday, 2 July from 09:00.
Someone who tuned in to the latest ‘fixed’ hearing ( last month) intends to do so again this coming Friday and here’s the message sent by the not-so-independent kangaroo court, sporting a not-so-independent E-mail address that the Office will spy on.
#Stealth control for mixxx software
They’re given a little sandbox in which to play, under constant pressure, first from Benoît Battistelli and then António Campinos along with his operatives (that’s how they managed to ram European software patents down our throats). The Enlarged Board of Appeal shows that all Boards of Appeal are basically kangaroo courts stacked for and by the “Mafia”. As we noted some weeks ago, the “Mafia” censors public submissions about obviously rigged cases of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBoA/EBA), which is not even imaginably independent. “They tried telling the public that sending the judges to an unlawful location (as collective punishment) would somehow restore their autonomy while they censor submissions to them, spy on their E-mails, and stack the hearings with not-so-independent operatives of Campinos.”Have things improved? Absolutely not. No consequences for libel of such judges (defaming them in collusion with bribed publishers), either. They can even kidnap judges whose words and rulings they dislike. Basically, a few people at the top - enjoying neither accountability nor oversight - do whatever they want. THE monolithic EPO is run by what EPO staff calls “Mafia”. Summary: Just like in so-called ‘third-world countries’, the top court of the EPO has only the false promise of judicial independence and they’ve made it very obvious and easy for everybody to see Posted in Europe, Patents at 6:14 pm by Dr. 06.29.21 Communications of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO Still Controlled by the Office, Which Also Censors Public Input Submissions (Observations)
0 kommentar(er)
